🔗 Share this article

Following a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from seeing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator petitioned the classification board to officially classify the available footage. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that allowed the regulator to order social media companies to restrict access to the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on another piece of footage—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been classified as "refused classification".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant argued the video was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of public importance that generated extensive public discourse". X drew a parallel between the video and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have met that threshold. As a result, the panel changed the classification of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Opinion

Some on the board held a contrary view, arguing the post was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of amusement and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the comparison to the Zapruder JFK film was invalid, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the decision.

"We challenged this case to uphold free speech and the importance of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to safeguarding these principles."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator also welcomed the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material is not accessible to users who are minors".

Broader Context on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been instructed to apply sensitive content labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on such content in line with their own content policies.